Your cart is currently empty!
Category: Blog
Your blog category
-
MXL 770: Finally it’s a YES
I never get over feeling excited when an inquiry comes in about a mic rebuild. But a certain number of them turn sad when I realize they are asking about an MXL 770.
The 770 is an extra tall version of the 990 but the cool thing is that it has switches for Pad and Filter functions. The 770 (like the 990) is a Transformerless Schoeps-style mic with the same (or similar) small capsule as the 990. It also comes with all the same shortcomings.
I’ve wanted to do a Transformer-Coupled board for the 770 for a long time. There were two technical hurdles to overcome for me to design the board:
- Sourcing switches that would fit on the board and extend through the body.
- With all the room that those switches take up, figuring out where to put the transformer.
Both sides of the BFM770. The pad and filter switches line up with the holes in the body Fitting it all in
Since the 770 does not have a separate switch board like the Sterling ST55 or MXL 5000, it’s necessary to fit both external switches on the main board with all the other parts. Of course, I also wanted room for the optional pattern switch. The problem is that those switches take up a lot of real estate. The solution was to mount the switches on the bottom and most of the other parts on the top. But that still leaves no where to fit the transformer.
some tweaks for v1.02 after the initial run. This is ready for production. Transformer Daughter Board
Fortunately, the transformer mounting board that I already had for other common mics fits in the space and already has mounting holes for some stand-offs.
Production Ready
The 770 is now fully supported and available for rebuilds (your mic) or pre-mods (my mic) in the store. I’ve managed to find a few bodies on ebay and have built a few up in various configurations. One of them is now my new favorite in the studio for vocals. I am pretty sure that all this will work with a 990-s (s for “switch”) and the 990 “patriot” which also has switches. I’ll keep my eye out for donors and try it out.
-
Transforming the MXL 5000: A RockScience BFM Rebuild with Custom PCB & Transformer Options
Introduction
The MXL 5000 is a sleeper hit in the world of affordable large-diaphragm condensers. With a sturdy metal body, a well-designed headbasket, andโunlike many budget micsโbuilt-in pad and high-pass filter switches, itโs already a solid contender. But what if we could elevate it even further?
Iโve been refining the BFM (Big F’m Microphone) circuit, a design inspired by the Neumann KM84, and now Iโm bringing it to the MXL 5000. This isnโt just a component swapโitโs a complete circuit replacement, featuring transformer-coupled output and a custom PCB that fully utilizes the micโs existing pad and filter switches!
The BFM-5000 board As usual, I’m offering multiple transformer options (Cinemag, Tab-Funkenwerk, or 3U Audio) and your choice of capsule (CK12 or K47 style), allowing you to fine-tune the micโs character to your taste. This board also has the optional internal Pattern switch to select Cardioid or Omni modes. The body must be opened up to access it, but on those occasions when you want an OMNI, it’s nice to have that trick.
In this post, weโll break down why this mod takes the MXL 5000 from “good” to studio-grade exceptional.
Finished 5000 with CK12 style Capsule and AMI Transformer Why Modify the MXL 5000?
The stock MXL 5000 is no slouchโitโs built like a tank, has a decent k67 style capsule and external switches on its TL circuit. But like many budget transformerless mics, it is over-bright, sibilant and harsh.
Our BFM rebuild addresses key limitations:
- Transformerless stock circuit โ Now transformer-coupled for added depth, weight, and vintage vibe.
- Basic FET amplification โ Upgraded with low-noise, hand-selected transistors for better clarity.
- Generic capacitors/resistors โ Replaced with premium WIMA, polystyrene, and metal film components for improved signal integrity.
- Capsule flexibility โ Choose between CK12 (bright, open) or K47 (warm, smooth) styles.
The Circuit: KM84-Inspired BFM Design
The BFM board is a refined take on the Neumann KM84โa circuit renowned for its balanced midrange, smooth highs, and natural tonality. There is very little in the audio path in that circuit: FET->Capacitor->Transformerโthat’s it!
Transformer Options: Pick Your Flavor
As usual, you can choose your transformer, each imparting a unique character:
- Cinemag โ Clean, detailed, with a slight midrange push.
- Tab-Funkenwerk โ Vintage-style warmth, reminiscent of old Telefunken mics.
- 3U Audio โ A modern take with a slightly lighter low end.
This flexibility lets you tailor the mic to your preferred tonal profileโclinical and accurate? Warm and colored?
Capsule Choices: CK12 vs. K47
This build allows a choice of two capsule styles, each suited for different applications:
- CK12-style โ Brighter, more open, with enhanced presence. Great for vocals that need air or acoustic instruments.
- K47-style โ Warmer, smoother, with a slight low-mid richness. Ideal for darker voices, electric guitars, or bass-heavy sources.
Component Upgrades: Whatโs Inside?
A great circuit is only as good as its parts. Hereโs what weโre using to maximize performance in all of our BFM builds:
- Polystyrene Capacitors โ Critical for clean high-frequency response.
- Low-noise metal film resistors โ Reducing thermal noise for a blacker background.
- Selected FETs โ Hand-biased for optimal distortion characteristics.
Sound Comparison: Stock vs. Modded
Stock MXL 5000:
- Decent clarity but can be slightly harsh in the upper mids.
- Transformerless circuit โ Lacks low-end weight and harmonic richness.
- Good features (pad/HPF), but the electronics limit its potential.
RockScience BFM Mod:
- Smoother, more balanced highs โ No harshness, just detailed air.
- Transformer-enhanced lows โ Fuller, more controlled low-end.
- Lower noise floor โ Cleaner signal for critical recordings.
- More “pro” vibe โ The KM84-inspired circuit adds a touch of vintage Neumann magic.
Best Uses for the Modded MXL 5000:
โ Vocals (especially with the K47 capsule for warmth)
โ Acoustic Guitar (CK12 for sparkle, K47 for body)
โ Drum Overheads (transformer helps with punch and depth)
โ Kick Drum – with K47 (get your 47FET mojo)
โ Electric Guitar Cabs (K47. The pad handles high SPL with ease)
Final Thoughts
The MXL 5000 has always been a solid platform, but with the RockScience BFM treatment, it becomes a true studio workhorse. Whether you want a vintage-voiced vocal mic (Tab-Funkenwerk + K47) or a detailed acoustic instrument mic (Cinemag + CK12), this mod delivers.
Ready to transform your MXL 5000?
๐ฉ Contact us for pricing and lead times.
๐ ๏ธ Check out our Mod Services page for more details.
Whatโs Your Dream Mic Combo?
CK12 + Cinemag for clarity? K47 + Tab-Funkenwerk for vintage warmth? Let us know in the comments!
-
Avoiding Common Issues Taking AWS Certification Exams
I just sat for the AWS Certified Cloud Architect Exam. And I even passed!
Pivoting to the software development side of RockScience, Here are some lessons learned around taking AWS Certification exams.
You’ve spent weeks or months studying and taking practice exams, building your own practice infrastructure and it’s finally time to sit for the exam. The last thing you need right now is a logistical gotcha. Here are some tips to avoid those.
Call me Robert
When you sign up for certifications at https://aws.amazon.com/certification/, you will be asked to create a Builder ID. This is where you set up the account for your certifications. This account info is then propagated to Pearson who actually administers the proctored exams.
When I did this, as usual my browser auto filled me as “Bob” and I just went with it as usual. MISTAKE!!!! The key here is to enter your name exactly as it appears on the identification document you are going to use (drivers license, passport, etc).
When I took the Cloud Practitioner exam, the proctor didn’t catch the discrepancy between my account name and the name on my license (Robert). I took (and passed) that exam. When it was time to sit for the Solutions Architect exam, the proctor bounced me because of the name mismatch.
Here’s the problem – if I didn’t already have any exam history, I would have been able to self-serve the name change in my account. But because the first proctor let me slide, the name could no longer be changed without opening a ticket with AWS. What a pain. On the other hand, it gave me more time to study. The issue was sorted within two days (and lots of back and forth), but it was a real hassle. On top of that, not only could I not use the voucher from the first exam to get half off, I had to pay full price again for the exam. So instead of $75, it was $225! I probably could have fought that, but was too exhausted and stressed by then.
Running the system check
DO run the system check! You don’t want any surprise on exam day. I suggest setting up your testing area exactly as it will be (I suggest even doing this for the practice exams). Make sure you have power, good internet and your wireless mouse is well charged up. You can’t have multiple monitors. If you have them, take them away so there is only on on the desk. If you are not doing this on a laptop, make sure your webcam wire is long enough that you can walk around your testing area (they will ask you to do this at check in).
The system test is going to look for applications and services that shouldn’t be running. Things like Dropbox and other sharing apps will be tagged. You need to figure out how to stop them running.
On a windows 11 laptop, one annoying one is going to be “tabtip.exe”. What the heck is that? It’s the virtual keyboard that pops up when you are using your laptop as a tablet. If you stop that in the task manager, windows re-launches is immediately. Here’s how to stop it. In settings, set this to “Never”. I burned up a few hours figuring this one out.
Download the system check each time you want to run it!
An interesting thing about the system check app, is that you download an instance of it for each time you want to run it. If you go to your downloads folder and just rerun the same instance again, it will almost succeed but will mysteriously fail the network check. That wasted a few panic stricken hours the night before my first exam. The key is to just follow the link from your email and download a new instance if you want to run it again.
Check in Procedure
This is fairly straightforward. You can start the process 30 minutes before your scheduled exam and if you get through it quickly, you can start the exam early. Take off your watch (see below)
You are prompted to take photos of your test area, a photo of your ID document and confirm your system settings (again). When you are done with your mobile phone and your ID, you are told told that from then on, you are being recorded and must follow the exam rules – including that you can not leave the field of view of your webcam. Your phone and ID card have to be out of arms reach, but you also may need them again if there is an issue. So when you are done with the phone, put it out of arms reach but in a place where you can get it while staying on camera.
Follow all the other rules too. Make sure the space is quiet around you. If they hear any voices (yours or anyone else), they will revoke the test. Schedule your test accordingly.
The Queue and the Greeter
You will be shown your position in the queue. It’s not unusual to be 10th-ish in the queue but it goes by pretty quick. Soon you will be Up Next! and a popup message from the greeter will say they are going to call you through the computer. You say OK and a voice chat starts. Here is where they ask you to pick up your laptop (or other webcam) and show the whole testing area once again. Then they’ll be asking you to show on the webcam that you are not wearing a watch. I’m sure that soon, you’re going to have to prove that you’re not wearing any kind of “smart” glasses.
Within a couple minutes, you are in the test. Hopefully you are ready and pass with a great score.
Learning Tips
This post is mostly about avoiding logistical issues, but I have some thoughts on how to study for this too. First of all, I highly recommend the Udemy courses and in particular the ones by Stรฉphane Maarek. But it can’t hurt to buy one of the other instructors’ courses too. They are cheap! I bought two courses and I also bought the set of practice exams from Stรฉphane. In total, I had six practice exams. My suggestion is to take the first one without looking up anything (cheating) to get a baseline. If you do great, then great! If you’re like me, you barely passed. For the subsequent exams, I did them as “open book” and I looked up and learned details right then and there for any questions I had doubts about. I think this made a huge difference for me.
Are the practice exams realistic?
This is the big question. I passed every single one… until the very last one (the morning of exam day). That one was massively harder than any of the others and I failed it miserably. That gave me a psychological whammy to deal with. For me, the real exam was maybe just slightly easier than the average of the practice exams. But that’s just my impression and I wouldn’t count on it!
Good Luck! Build something cool! Hire me to help!
-
SDC Mics: Say hello to my little friends
I’ve been building Transformer Coupled LDC mics for a while now. My BFM (Big F’n Microphone) circuit is adapted from the Neumann KM-84 (kleines Mikrofon – 84) circuit with very minor differences from the original. I have finally gotten round to building some SDC mics with another adaption of the BFM circuit called the TFM (Tiny F’n Microphone).
Donor Bodies
Donor bodies are plentiful for these mics. From MXL alone, there are 551, 991 603s and 840 (and maybe more). The 551s and 991s are usually in a set with a 550 or 990 respectively, but sometimes we can find them alone.
TFM Circuit
The TFM really is pretty tiny. There is not a lot of wiggle room on the board – especially when a large chunk of the board is taken up by the Transformer. Fortunately the KM48 and our derivation of it is a very simple circuit and within a few revisions of the board, everything is fitting and working out well. As with the LDC bards, the capsule and FET wiring is off board and using Keystone insulated turrets for the point-to-point wiring.
Transformers and Capsules
I’ve been building my BFM boards with either CineMag or AMI transformers, but will now be offering the 3U GZT-84 Transformer. The tone is slightly brighter than the CineMag or AMI and it it seems to have a bit more harmonic distortion in the low frequencies than the others. And this is largely what gives transformer mics their sound.
For capsules, I am offering options from 3U Audio. Their capsules come in several polar patterns apart from the standard cardioid and they sound amazing. Because the capsule is easily field-replaceable, you can get several capsules for your mic and swap in the one that is appropriate for what you are trying to capture.
-
New Microphone Footprints Afoot
Since I’ve been building and rebuilding microphones, I’ve only imported one type of body – the so-called BM800 style body. These are what I’ve been using for the RS/ series mics like the RS/47, RS/12t and RS/47t.
I’ve been tempted to try some other shapes and sizes that I see on my various suppliers’ websites and I finally acquired a few samples of some new styles. New shapes mean new Circuit Boards and I’ve finished jaSb (just another Schoeps board) transformerless and BFM (Big F’n Microphone) transformer-coupled board designs for both new bodies.
The Tall Boy Telefunken-ish style
When I ordered this thing, the photo didn’t do justice to how huge it is! First impressions are that it’s a nice quality body with a heavy cylinder and a good quality headbasket. The Internal frame is much bigger than a BM-800 style and so the circuit board is nice and big. The jaSb and BFM boards were very easy to design for this mic given all the space. In both cases, all components can fit on one side and in the case of the BFM, there is actually room for the transformer right on the main board!
jaSb Tall-Boy board BFM Tall-Boy Board The TLM 102 Style
I was really excited to find a good source for these. I’ve always loved the look of the “little” Neumanns and I occasionally get asked about rebuilding a TLM mic (or a TLM clone). Until now, I had no circuitry that would fit. The samples arrived and I’m really happy with them. The cylinder is solid and heavy and the headbasket is beautiful.
In terms of size, this is the extreme opposite of the Tall Boy. These are tiny and the the circuit board layouts were very challenging – especially the transformerless jaSb version which has many more parts.
Unlike most of my other builds, these mics are not so straightforward to open. The headbasket is fastened to the body with three hex set-screws. For that reason and because of the limited size of the board, I’m not going to fit the optional internal pattern switch in theses. They will be full-time cardioid (or omni if you wanted). The board is round like an MXL 990 but only 47mm in diameter (with some notches cut out) compared to the 53mm diameter of the 990 board. Besides losing the pattern switch, I had to put some components on the bottom side for both boards.
-
Microphone Care
No matter what mics are in your collection, you want to take care of them. No matter how cool or boutique or amazing a mic is, if you go to use it and itโs got a problem, itโs worthless at that moment. I’ve learned a lot from doing the Custom Microphone Mod Shop and I’ll share some of that here.
Storage
Mic Cabinet, Mic Shelf, Shoe Boxโฆ Everyone has their own version of the โmic lockerโ. Besides questions of theft security, the main things you should be worried about here are
- Moisture
- Dust
- Accidental Damage
Microphones have very sensitive elements. Condensers and Ribbons especially have extremely low mass surfaces which pick up the sound waves. It takes a very small amount of dust and/or moisture to significantly alter this mass and therefore the ability of the element to translate sound pressure into voltage.
Iโve had some mics come into my shop for rebuilding and the capsules were actually corroded and pitted from years of being in high moisture environments. And when they get wet, they also get caked with dust.Desiccant (Do Not Eat)
Those little desiccant packets are your friends. We all get them when we buy junk from Amazon. It does no harm to throw a few of them in where you store your mics. If you are in a high humidity environment (get a Hygrometer to measure), Iโd strongly suggest storing your mics in a room that has a Dehumidifier running. Keeping the capsule dry is probably the single most important thing you can do.
Microphone Dominos
Another obvious tip for storage is to keep the mics in such a way as to avoid accidentally damaging or dropping them. Standing a bunch of mics up on a shelf may look cool, but sooner or later you’re going to knock one over (which will certainly knock the rest over). This, I know first-hand.
Hot-Plugging
I see some variation of this question on Facebook all the time. Is it safe to plug in in a mic with Phantom Power already on? The other related question is if it is safe to apply Phantom Power to Dynamic or Ribbon Mics (often you donโt have any choice when using low-end mixers with one phantom switch for all channels).
If everything is working right with Phantom Power, there is an equal voltage potential on pins 2 and 3 with respect to ground (pin 1). That means there is NO potential across the output transistors or transformer. The reason there is any question about hot plugging is that unless you can insert the XLR jack at the speed of light, there is going to be some tiny instant of time where pin 2 or pin 3 makes contact before the other. During that time, there IS a potential across the output transistors or transformer. Notice I said โIf everything is working rightโ. Having a bad mic cable with pin2 or 3 disconnected or intermittent is going to cause the p48 to be applied across your output device. Maybe it can take it… maybe it can’t.
Does it matter?
This is what everyone wants to know. To me itโs like asking if itโs safe to cross the street. My answer is that it is usually perfectly safe. Transformerless condenser mics (at least all ones that I am familiar with) have protection diodes in the output section to provide protection to the output transistors. Some mics use transistors which can easily tolerate this voltage even without the diodes. Most transformer-coupled Condenser mics should tolerate this too.
Bottom line, Iโd avoid hot-plugging, but I wouldnโt worry too much about it.
Ribbons
Ribbons are a different animal. They donโt need phantom power but they may have it applied for one reason or another. You might switch it on by mistake or again, if itโs plugged in with an all-or-nothing type device that puts phantom on all inputs. I have less experience with Ribbons, but I believe it should be ok to have a stable phantom voltage applied (Iโve certainly done it with no problems). I think it is probably best to avoid hot plugging ribbons and if you canโt avoid having phantom applied, make sure the mic cable is a good one with no intermittent connections.
Dynamics
In my experience Dynamic mics are pretty bulletproof. They can tolerate hot plugging (and pounding in nails).
Shipping/Transporting
One thing Iโve learned the hard way over the last year is that Shipping Carriers are very good at wrecking microphones. The opening scene of โAce Ventura, Pet Detectiveโ is probably a bit of an exaggeration but maybe not by much. Large Diaphragm Condenser microphones do not like rapid Deceleration (ie: sudden impact). The capsule is heavy and typically suspended with a pretty feeble mounting cradle. Why not make the mounting stronger? Because the optimal microphone would have NO cradle at all – the capsule would be magically suspended in mid air by some unseen force. Since this technology does not yet exist, we use cradles that are as strong as possible while being as thin as possible. The net result is several broken capsule cradles which were not broken when they left my shop.
Rode NT2 after UPS got through with it.ย The capsule cradle broke and the capsule is destroyed. When mics come to be for rebuilds, I am often horrified at the packaging. The mics are slamming around inside the box and they are wrapped with one thin layer of bubble wrap (if that). I generally donโt care because I am typically replacing the entire guts of the mic anyway.
You canโt prevent careless handling all the way through the chain. I recently shipped a mic to a customer (with six red โFragile!โ labels on the box) and watched the clerk toss it onto a pile of boxes about five feet away. This was at Point A with me watching! Imagine what happens between point A and B.
Deceleration
The best you can hope to do is slow down that rapid deceleration (absorbing the shock) when the mic inevitably gets thrown, dropped, kicked, whatever.
Contrary to popular belief, bubble wrap is really not very good at absorbing shock. You want elasticity/cushioning, and bubble wrap doesnโt really offer much of that. Itโs great at taking up space (also important). If you have the original packaging for the mic, it will typically be in some soft cushioning foam. This is what you want. If you donโt have the original foam, I suggest getting some soft shipping foam (1 or 2 inch thick) and wrap the mic in it. You want to absorb shock on all axis – they might drop it upside down!
If your only choice is bubble wrap, use a lot of it. Spend the extra money on the larger package and wrap it in a big fat cocoon!
Shake Test
Once closed up, shake the box. There should be NO movement inside the box. This is where bubble wrap and craft paper are valuable. They are great at filling the space so the mic can not move (accelerate / decelerate) inside the box.
Crash Test
After my third customer had a mic arrive with a broken capsule cradle (and an expensive ruined capsule), I upped my packaging game and decided to do a little test. With my latest packaging, I tossed a mic out of the second story window to the pavement below. It survived perfectly. (Iโd like to point out that this was my microphone, not a customerโs mic).
Troubleshooting
Believe it or not, there are not that many things that can go wrong with a mic. Thereโs an element, a circuit and/or transformer and a connector. Depending on the type of mic, different symptoms can mean different things.
A good first step is to make sure the problem IS the mic and not the mic preamp. Plug in a similar type of mic and verify that it does not have the same problem.
Hum –
Condenser mics are extremely susceptible to hum pickup. Inside that body, they are converting a very weak high impedance signal from a capsule to a signal capable of driving a low impedance input on your mic preamp. Hum almost always means that the body shielding has lost some integrity. Very often this is simply some oxidation on where the various pieces of the body fasten together. The idea is to have a very good connection from pin 1 of the XLR through all of the body and headbasket parts. Itโs usually possible to take the body apart and clean the edges and surfaces. You can even take a scotch brite pad to the edges. Normally, this will solve the hum. If the hum continues or is intermittent, it may be that the circuit board is not making a good grounding contact for some reason. This might get a little harder to figure out on your own.
In the case of Tube mics, another likely culprit is the power supply itself. It probably has a failing filter cap. One hint to this is if the tone actually sounds more like 120/100Hz rather than 60/50 Hz. If so, it is definitely a power supply problem because you are hearing full wave rectified AC mains.
Hiss –
In my experience, this is always the result of one of the zener diodes failing in a Condenser Mic. Depending on the design, there is at least one zener for the power supply and additional ones for hot-plugging protection (see above). Any one of those could be the culprit but in my experience, itโs always been one of the protection diodes. If you have some basic soldering and desoldering skills, these are not hard to replace. The protection diodes are typically 6.2v. You could also just try removing them (and then be extra careful about hot-plugging).
Whistle –
This is a strange and interesting one. Many transformerless condenser mics actually have an oscillator in them. This is used to step up the voltage to polarize the capsule. That oscillator runs at around 2 Megahertz so you should never hear it. But sometimes, a problem with the oscillator circuit can cause it to produce a component in the audio range. Another strange thing that can happen is if some of that oscillator tone leaks into ground, it can cause interference with other mics. If the two micsโ oscillators are within 20KHz of each other, you may be hearing a difference frequency.
Low Output –
If a condenser mic suddenly has a low output, there are a few possibilities but before we look at the mic, remember the part above about checking the preamp. This could be a problem with low phantom power voltage. Some mics perform very poorly with low p48. I had a Behringer device on my bench that on a good day would only put out about 14 volts! Most of my mics worked ok, but I had an oktava that was totally silent.
Assuming itโs the mic, this is probably not good news. It might be the capsule itself. If the mic has a pattern switch, flip it to omni mode and see if the output is still low. If not, it probably means that the front diaphragm of the capsule has failed. Otherwise, weโre into the circuit (or transformer) and this is probably a job for a tech.If a condenser mic has a low output on power-up, give it a minute to warm up. I mean this for non-tube mics too. Some mics (like the Rode NT2) have a very slow charge up time for polarizing the capsule. Until I learned that, I thought I broke a customerโs mic – it was silent on power-up. The NT2 takes 70 seconds to fully charge the capsule!
-
Microphone Repair
Sometimes you just want your mic to work again. Our mic mods are really full rebuilds so they are very effective microphone repairs too. No matter what has gone wrong with your mic, chances are the broken bit is being replaced. I often buy “broken – for parts” mics off the interwebs and rebuild them. As long as the body hasn’t been run over by a car (I’ve seen this), the mic can be made whole again and drastically improved over its former stock self.
Broken SP C1 mic Most (non-tube) mic problems come down to either the capsule or the circuit board. I replace them both so the chances are pretty good that your dead mic will live again. Someone sent me a dead Studio Projects C1 to see what I could do with. In this case, the capsule was damaged and easily replaced. The circuit in that mic is actually pretty good as-is so we left that alone.
Broken BM800 Looking and Sounding Great A throw-away cheapo-amazon BM800 came through the door totally non-functional. The board and capsule were junked and we made a lovely transformerless mic with a k47 style capsule which has gone to a good home and gets regular use.
Rescued (broken) MXL 990 MXL 990s seem to get all the abuse. Of all the mics I’ve modded, these seem to come in the most beat up. Whenever I can find one on ebay or reverb being sold as “broken / for parts”, I jump at it. The most recent one became my very first Transformer-Coupled 990 mod. This mic repair has turned into one of my favorite mics in my collection.
-
MXL 990 Microphone Mods
Depending on who you ask, the MXL 990 is either awful or amazing. I have mixed feelings about these mics. Despite their shortcomings, no one can argue that they are immensely popular. They come at a price point which puts them in the hands of many thousands of musicians, singers, producers and engineers. They’ve helped launch the career of many and are probably heard on a surprising number of hits. For MXL to put a functional, entry level mic into the hands of so many is pretty amazing. For that, I have a lot of respect for this mic.
The other positive thing I will say about them is that mechanically, they are robustly built considering the price point. Every time I work on one, I am amazed that it has a street price of under 100 bucks (including case and shockmount). Unlike a lot of other low cost mics, the 990 has a pretty heavy body cylinder and a professional feel and weight.
A finished and pretty rebuilt MXL 990 On the down side is that you get what you pay for. The MXL 990, oft marketed as an LDC, is actually not. The capsule is a small 24mm capsule and similar to what you find in the 910m 550, 440m, v250 and various other models. The circuit is a garden variety Schoeps-derived board and depending on the vintage, the components are either surface mount or low-end thru-hole stuff. MXL knows how to cut corners to make this price point! The stock tone of MXL990s tends to be thin, harsh and sibilant.
That Headbasket…
It’s almost like they didn’t want the mic to look too good. The form factor of the mic is sort of short and fat like a Neumann M49 and that gives it almost a cool look. But that headbasket is pretty ugly. Not only is it ugly, but they put three layers of mesh in the screen! Despite their best efforts, some sound does actually manage to make it to the capsule.
So, What Do We Do?
In all cases, I will replace the tiny MXL 990 Capsule with a good quality 34mm LDC. I mount the capsule in my own custom designed cradle but reuse the MXL base and post which is actually quite a slick design.
Since the beginning, I’ve had a version of my jaSb (just another Schoeps board) which is designed to fit the MXL990 (this board also fits the very rare MXL 920). This is the transformerless solution and I typically pair it with a K47-style Center-Terminated Capsule. The jaSb board will also work with a CK-12 style Edge-Terminated Capsule with a minor alteration.
Standard MXL 990 board(L) and our jaSb all discrete board (R) Here is a short before/after video I did with a Transformerless MXL 990 Mod I did. The guitars, Bass and Vocals are all recorded with both versions of the mic and we switch back and forth. The difference is quite astounding I think. There is NO EQ on any of those tracks on either version of the mic.
Our transformer-coupled circuit – the BFM (Big F’n Microphone) is also available for the 990 (and 920). So we have an option to transformerize your MXL 990 with choice of high quality transformers from CineMag, 3U Audio and AMI. This greatly expands the color palette for these mics. These also have an optional internal pattern switch so you can switch the mic into omni mode when you need it.
The BFM-990 Transformer Coupled Board Headbasket Options
The MXL 990 is one mic that really needs some attention to the headbasket. As I said above, the stock one is awful. Fortunately, we have a couple of options. The first is to use the awesome replacement headbasket from mic-parts.com. They look and function beautifully. I normally have a couple in stock for mods or this is also something you can order from them and do yourself any time. It gives the mic a really slick professional look.
The other option is to just make the existing headbasket suck less. This is a trick that lots of people do and it simply involves removing some layers of mesh from the screen. It’s a bit of a struggle, but I’ve done enough of them now that I’ve got it down.
Mic-Parts Headbasket (L) and Modified MXL Headbasket (R) Is a MXL 990 Mod Right For You?
If you’ve got an MXL 990 and are not using it because of it’s flaws, this is very affordable way of turning it into a go-to mic that you will find lots of uses for. On the other hand, if you are using it and thinking of selling it to get something better, doing this upgrade is a pretty good and very affordable option. The result is a pretty significant upgrade! Check out the mic mod service page for more details or contact me with any questions!
-
Best Microphone Mods
It all started out as experiments with microphone parts, diy microphone kits and k47 capsules, and turned into the microphone mod service! Here are some of the best mics to modify from work I’ve done over the past year. Read on to see how we customize a microphone.
MXL 990 Mod
MXL 990s are everywhere. Mechanically, it’s a well-built studio condenser microphone with some great weight to it. The internal frame is sturdy and nothing feels cheesy about it – except the sound. To hit this price point, MXL uses a small diameter capsule and a mass-produced circuit board.
I replace the circuit with my jaSb-990 board which is specifically designed for the MXL 990. It’s a Schoeps-derived circuit build with high grade components, hand-biased FET, hand-matched output driver transistors and optional internal pattern switch. The jaSb circuit has an extra-robust voltage regulator so it works perfectly on low phantom power voltages (as found in some low-end audio and video gear).
The capsule is normally replaced with a k47-style LDC although we could certainly do a CK12-style in these as well for a little bit brighter tone.
Most customers have opted for the improved headbasket from mic-parts. It definitely gives the mic a more pro look and theoretically better sonic performance because of reduced interference, resonance and standing waves. The one downside of 990s for me, is that as far as I know, mic-parts is the only source on the planet for an improved 990 headbasket so that’s a bit of a supply chain risk.
The short video gives an idea of the improvement after the mod. The results are similar for most low cost Transformerless Mics after the rebuild.
MXL Board (L) jaSb990 (R) jaSb-990 red and badged Two new graduates
MXL 910 Mod
The MXL 910 is a popular tall cylindrical mic from MXL. It’s got a standard MXL internal frame which my jaSb-800 (Transformerless) or BFM-800 (Transformer-Coupled) boards fit. It’s another SDC that looks like an LDC. The headbasket is actually quite nice on these with a dual layer (dual gauge) mesh and lots of room for an LDC capsule. It is one of the few MXLs where they actually put a cardioid emblem on the headbasket itself. It has all the usual cut-corners from MXL to make the price point: mass-produced circuit board and small capsule. The body cylinder is on the light side (but not the lightest from MXL).
For a Transformerless rebuild, I replace the MXL board with the jaSb-800. For Transformer-Coupled Rebuilds, it gets a BFM-800 and a transformer mounting board. The capsule can be either a K47-style or CK12-style. In both cases, I replace the entire MXL pedestal/cradle system with my own pedestal which gets the Capsule nicely centered in the grill.
Overall, I like these a lot and I’ve done quite a few in all configurations
Transformer Coupled build TL and TC builds TL and TC builds Hard at work
MXL v250 “stupid deal” Mic Mod
Every once in a while these show up as the stupid deal of the day on Musicians Friend – for $69 and free shipping. You can imagine the corners being cut to make that happen! The v250 is one of MXLs “BM800” footprint mics. It’s got the usual Small Capsule and very minimal mass-produced Schoeps style circuit. It’s quite awful frankly. But this has been one of my favorite rebuilds to do because the improvement is so huge!
I’ve done transformerless (TL) and transformer-coupled (TC) rebuilds of these using either the jaSb-800 or BFM-800 boards. The headbasket is pretty good on these. The body cylinder is very thin/light material so the mic will not have a real substantial weight to it.
Stock Stuff New Board New Capsule Final Assembly
Sterling Audio ST55 Mod
Also sold as the Groove Tubes GT55, this transformer-coupled mic has a lot up its sleeve. The original capsule in the ST55 Sterling uses a “resonator disk” to increase the high frequency response of the mic. This seems to counteract the high end that is lost in the transformer and circuit they use. The result is a so-so tone that has lots of room for improvement. The extra tricks consist of separate hi-pass and pad switches. The internal footprint of the mic is unique so I designed a version of the BFM specifically for it: the BFM-T-55. This circuit supports the pad and filter switches and adds the internal pattern switch. So after the mod, it has even one more trick.
It was this mic that first got me into transformer coupled designs and the development of the BFM (Big F’n Microphone) boards. The BFM is derived from the Neumann KM48 circuit design but adapted for an LDC. KM stands for Klein Mikrofon (Small Microphone) hence my twist on the name. I’ve built four of these so far with both low-cost chinese transformers and CineMags. The CineMag 5722w is perfect for the BFM circuit because it is actually a recreation of the BV107 tranny that was in the KM84!
Innards Front Innards Rear Sterling ST55s In the stand
BM800 Cheap-o Amazon Mic Mod
I include this one because like Rodney Dangerfield, this mic gets no respect. This particular one was a craigslist rescue. It was non-functional but I cared not about that. BM800s are all over amazon and other retail outlets for incredibly cheap prices. I’ve seen them as low as $15 including a cord and shockmount! BM800 isn’t so much a model as it is a standard. This is why the jaSb-800 board will fit in just about any common cylindrical mic.
This one got the usual treatment of jaSb-800 circuit with optional pattern switch and a k47-style capsule. When finished, this throw-away mic was transformed to perform equally with any other transformerless builds I do. The body is lightweight and a bit wimpy feeling, but the headbasket has a good size and mesh to it. I gave it a paint job and it’s now got a home with a happy customer. He even left a nice review saying “This mic has a wonderfully low noise floor and beautiful, soft detail on the high end.“
-
CineMag is In The House!
From the beginning of my transformer mic build experiments, I had wanted to use a transformer which was as close to the original BV-107 found in the Neumann KM84 as possible. That’s because my BFM (Big F’n Microphone) board is a modern recreation of the KM84 circuit but adapted to LDC capsules. CineMag makes a BV-107 recreation they call the 5722. It is a 6.9:1 turns ratio hum-bucking transformer which is ideal for the BFM circuit. I contacted them several times early on by email and really didn’t get very far (other than a price quote). They do not really have a web store per-se or a dealer network. Frustrated by that, I started using the low-cost imported Transformers and an expensive one by AMI.
A few weeks ago, I thought I’d go old school and actually call CineMag on the phone (I forgot my phone actually has that feature). David Geren himself answered the phone and took my order for a small batch. Wow!
The Shootout
I had previously done shootouts between the Imported Chinese Transformer and the AMI. I have two RS/47Ts – each with one of those installed. For the CineMag test, I reworked a Sterling ST55 rebuild I had. This one also had the Chinese transformer but I swapped that out for the CineMag. All mics now have the same capsule and circuitry. The only variation is the transformer.
Below is a result of some recordings made with both. In all cases the AMI is first then the CineMag (after a short pause). Shorter and shorter loops let you hear the tonal differences easier.
CineMag Transformers (L) ST55 Test Body (C) Shootout CineMag vs AMI (R) To my ears, the AMI is a bit more mid-forward as the kids like to say. The guitar seems to have a bit more presence with the AMI, but the CineMag has a little more silky of a top-end. It’s that top-end sheen that I felt was missing from the AMI in my previous tests. They both have a beautiful crunch on the hard strums of the guitar. This is why we love transformers!
That’s what it sounds like. What’s it look like?
I ran swept-sine tests on both mics to compare the distortion and frequency response characteristics of the Circuit/Transformer. The differences are subtle but meaningful. The CineMag has a bit more 2nd and 3rd harmonic distortion over most of the spectrum. The AMI has a bit more in the very low frequencies. Interestingly, the fundamental frequency response shows that the CineMag actually has a bit more low end and a subtle drop at the high end. This just goes to show that the distortion characteristics have more of an effect on what we perceive as bright or dark than does the frequency response – at least with transformers.
In-circuit tests of CineMag (L) and AMI (R) showing 2nd, 3rd, 4th Harmonic distortion Conclusions?
Overall, I think the CineMag is going to win the day. It is slightly less expensive than the AMI and I think more versatile. It pairs nicely with the k47 style capsules which have a relatively flat high end. The AMI would win if I wanted a very mid-forward mic with lots of harmonics in the low end. Maybe on kick drum or bass cabinets, upright bass, etc. This is all very subtle stuff and either would work well on just about anything. For that matter, the cheap Chinese transformers really don’t sound all that bad and I will still offer them in the shop.